Scientists Discover 400-Year-Old Greenland Shark Likely Born Around 1620
Greenland sharks are now the longest-living vertebrates known on Earth, according to scientists.

Researchers used radiocarbon dating of eye proteins to determine the ages of 28 Greenland sharks, and estimated that one female was about 400 years old. The former vertebrate record-holder was a bowhead whale estimated to be 211 years old.
As lead author Julius Nielsen, a marine biologist from the University of Copenhagen, put it: “We had our expectations that we were dealing with an unusual animal, but I think everyone doing this research was very surprised to learn the sharks were as old as they were.”

Greenland sharks are huge and can grow up to 5m in length. Yet, they grow at just 1cm a year. They can be found, swimming slowly, throughout the cold, deep waters of the North Atlantic.
The team believes the animals only reach sexual maturity when they are 4m-long. And with this new, very lengthy age-range, it suggests this does not occur until the animals are about 150 years old.

The research was made possible, in part, by the atmospheric thermonuclear weapons tests conducted during the 1960s, which released massive amounts of radiocarbon that were then absorbed by organisms in ocean ecosystems. Sharks that showed evidence of elevated radiocarbon in the nucleus of their eye tissue were therefore born after the so-called “bomb pulse,” and were younger than 50 years old, while sharks with lower radiocarbon levels were born prior to that, and were at least 50 years old or older, the study authors wrote.
The scientists then calculated an age range for the older sharks based on their size, and on prior data about Greenland sharks’ size at birth and growth rates in fish.

According to the results of the analysis – which has a probability rate of about 95 percent – the sharks were at least 272 years old, and could be as much as 512 years old (!) with 390 years as the most likely average life span, according to Nielsen.
But why do Greenland sharks live so long? Their longevity is actually attributed to their very slow metabolism and the cold waters that they inhabit. They swim through the cold waters of the Arctic and the North Atlantic at such a sluggish pace that has earned them the nickname “sleeper sharks.” Seal parts have been found in their bellies, but the sharks move so slowly that experts have suggested that the seals must have been asleep or already dead when the sharks ate them.
Sources: 1, 2
80.4k
SHARES
nothing on a great white!
Lmao Trump gets brought into everything ppl r rediculous…life is what u make it y b miseravle anyways great article, very interesting
Is there a “dog year/shark year” thing going on? Are we talking actually lived years or??
Some of these comments are unbelievable…. good for a laugh!…ppl are crazy!… lol
Wow that is utterly amazing! What else lurks beneath the murky waters ? By the way , your book is great but scaring me lol. Not done yet.
Eqalussuasaurus🤔😄👌🏼
They should more accurately name them US Postal sharks.
I guess they should name it “Pilgrim” (Mayflower 1620).
They stated the age dating method was based on the shark growing 1cm per year … how do they know the shark didn’t grow more quickly when it was younger, then its growth slowed as it aged? Just curious …
they pro looked at young sharks for data on young sharks
They didn’t use that to determine age, they used radiocarbon dating on the eye proteins
They actually did use the yearly growth rate to estimate the sharks age that are older than 50 years old because they didn’t have anything else to reference for example they referenced the sharks eyes with the nuclear bomb teats in the 60’s to determine the younger ones were 50 years old or less.
Researchers used radiocarbon dating of eye proteins to determine the ages.
No carbon daring their eye was how they estimated the age and then estimated that their growth was that for comparing birth size to more mature sharks.
This articale was awesome! I found it soooooooo interesting!😃😃😃😃
I think this is amazing and so much to be learned from this study. Some of the comments and of course one must add something political, are ridiculous. Cant we jsut experience the report for what it is. Clearly the shark was released. Another picture shows a diver swimming with the sharks. Please let us enjoy the read without your personal need to espouse your views unrelated.
My thoughts exactly. I loved the article
Do you know the only thing more important than your life? ~Life Itself~ Without it you would never have had yours.
All they needed was some proteins from the eyes for radio carbon dating.
THIS is GREAT…
Don’t tell China, it will be another cure for some unknown disease. Let’s leave the creatures alone
ha yes
Agreed!!!
You see…things could alwsy be worse…you could have been born a Greenland SharK…What a dreadful life!!
Would be fine with me. Life as a liberal would be far worse
What a ridiculous statement!
Agreed!
right, maga idiots will not inherit the earth…all they want to do is suck it dry.
Now that’s a nasty thing to say. What does that have to do with sharks and longevity? This is exactly the mentality Trump has adopted about science: Science vs politics. Leave the politics out of science. You want a cure to every disease you acquire the same as any other liberal or conservative does. Ya gotta quit with that mindset for the sake of science.
All I can say is that these sharks must get awfully tired . . . don’t ya think? Wow!
Aks a boy if he gets tired from playing computer games for 20 hours daily…🦈
Right is the correct headline Scientists Kill Oldest Shark in the Ocean to See How Old It Is
They released them back into the sea.
They didn’t kill it, I don’t think, it they found an already dead one
They don’t kill them when they catch them. They study them and put them back, as they do for all.
They took samples from the eye to carbon date
That is indeed what “science” is capable of…we call it “research’”
Do you even know how to science?!) Lol. At least read the article. There is no longer a need to kill animals in the wild to conduct research. The shark was not killed. The article even says that. Please learn. Please read.
They probably dissected a shark that was dead already. Because you are right, Scientists would not kill such a rare and old creature.
Inuit fisherman from Greenland catch the Sharks and feed them to the sled dogs, as the meat is not fit for human consumption. River Monsters had a good episode on Greenland sharks. Worth the watch.
Incorrect, it is considered a delicacy served after being buried for a year. The meat has a similar effect on dogs pre burying as it does humans & so they would not wish to jeopardise their dogs. They stuff them with birds & bury them & they are served for celebratory feasts. The Icelandic people do something similar & call it Hákarl. Other sleeper sharks also can be used in the same fashion.
Dang Eloise are you from Greenland or Iceland? That’s pretty interesting what does it taste like?
I saw that episode quite awesome!
I was thinking the same thing, how do they know what was in their belly & what did they do to get to the conclusions since its testing the eyes, now they’ve made it public will they stay safe or an on slaughter will be on their way
Why is the shark hooked? This seems Unusually cruel; especially when studying such a rare creature!
Thank you
Did they kill the shark to learn its stomach contents? Did they poke a needle in her eye?
They kill 10 or so per year, the easiest way is to stab them through the eye.
Greenland sharks are eaten in Iceland and Norway. The meat must be carefully prepared or it will be poisonous.
I’m from Norway, and people here certainly do no such thing!!! In Iceland they eat other, more common sharks (dogfish) but not Greenland sharks. I don’t think they live anywhere close to Iceland either.
So interesting. Thank for your work and reporting.
So is your headline serious? It sounds like satire: “Scientists Discover 400-Year-Old Greenland Shark Likely Born Around 1620”.
About what year would you expect a 400-year-old shark to be born? Surely 400 years ago! 🙂
Date is correct…
You sound like and old grumpy man who have to complain over everything he can think about, instead of being amassed over this animal…. 😉
well they can’t exactly ask the shark its age so… yes its a guesstimate
Either your eyesight or your arithmetic is faulty
Some people really cannot do aimple math. Some may even think 400 doesn’t sound so old, until they think about how long ago 1620 was.
But it is redundant.